Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Guns/Hiring_Lawyers.txt

Text File | 1996-07-08 | 6KB | 108 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------

The following was sent to me, the author wishes to remain anonymous.

Before you hire an attorney for a class action challange on gun ownership
or constitutional issues, perhaps you best read the following. It is most
informative and perhaps you will recognise why "We, the People" don't
often win in the courts. It addresses questions that can no longer remain
silent.
     One profession conspicuously missing from the list of professions
licensed by the Secretary of State to do business in this Commonwealth is
ATTORNEY and/or Judge. Why isn't the STATE licensing the lawyers and
judges to insure their competence and their adherence to constitutional
law?
     The State courts are a fraud. They are all privately controlled by
the private members who practice their business in it. If the ABA is
licensed as a corporation to do business in the State like any major
insurance company, then their members, (attorneys), must also be
licensed, as are the agents for the insurance company. Lawyers only have
a certificate from either the private American Bar Association or the
college they graduated from. How can a private corporation have STATE
licensing power?  Isn't the STATE's responsibility to license. If the
private corporation ABA can issue a license to practice law, why can't
the private corporation General Motors issue a license to drive a
car?
     We all know the ABA issues licenses to lawyers who then go on to
become judges. Therefore, no court belongs to the people or government,
as none of the practitioners' are licensed by the State, but are licensed
by a private corporation that is allowed to do business in this State,
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
     All Judges and attorneys belong to and are licensed by the private
American Bar Association. The ABA has created a private judiciary and
court system.  This conclusive presumption of private judiciary can
easily be shown.  See  Cromelin v. United States, 177 F2d 275; LePatourel
cases, 571 F 2d 405 & 593 F 2d 827; Viola A. Tomalewski v. United States,
493 F Supp. 673; Foster v. McBride, 521 F 2d 1304, where it is stated
that all judges are under a private judiciary. No one is allowed to
"practice law" in any court unless they are a member of this private
organization. Therefore, all judges are beholding to this private
organization or they lose the license it gives them. No attorney/judge is
ever licensed by the state government that they practice in to do
business in the private ABA courts.
     How can a judge swear to uphold the Constitution when he takes
office knowing that he belongs to a private club whose orders he must
follow, or he will loose his license to practice law.
     Attorney's know that accepting a license places the licensee under
the jurisdiction of the licenser. Wouldn't the ABA, by relinquishing its
licensing power to the State, have to abandon its private, quasi,
colorable law, and its privately run courts.
     If the State doesn't license attorneys, can they prevent any other
private licensing body from authorizing the  practice of law in this
State?  Should the State allow an attorney or judge who is not licensed
by it to practice in its courts? If the State allows the attorneys
licensed by the ABA as adequate to use our courts, should the courts be
paid for with public tax dollars. Is it constitutional for the State to
allow a private corporation to control the use of the public courts, that
are supposed to be for and by the people.
     So let's start doing something about it by contacting the Secretary
of your State and asking for a certified copy of the ABA being registered
to do business in the State; the license issued to the attorneys by the
State government allowing them to also do business in the State; the
recorded oaths of office of the judges and their financial disclosure
sheets. Now, if the State doesn't license the attorneys, how can they
prevent you from practicing law in the State?  How can the State allow an
attorney who is not licensed by it to practice in its courts? If the
State allows the attorneys to be licensed by the ABA as being adequate,
then they are allowing a private corporation to control the use of the
public courts, paid for by tax dollars, that are supposed to be for and
by the people, correct?
     Also remember to do this process with the United States Secretary of
State for Federal judges and attorneys. Then make sure the State allows
the Federal judges and U.S. Attorneys to do business by registering and
issuing them a license, for they are just as foreign to your State as
your neighboring State. A Pennsylvania attorney can't practice
in Ohio without permission, can he? But whose permission, the State or
the private ABA controlled court? You all complain about the court
system, now let's rattle their cages and see how a cornered rat reacts.


*************************************************************************
Send comments or private communication to list moderator/admin
Howard L. Bloom at [e-mail].  All posts are the responsibility
of the poster.  Howard L. Bloom assumes no liability for the content
of any message per UCC 1-207 with explicit reservation of rights..

To unsubscribe or subcribe send email to "[e-mail]
put nothing in the subject line and in body put either unsubscribe or
subscribe.


------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer.


All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])